Connect with us
Terry Crews Terry Crews

For The Culture

Terry Crews Gathers DL Hughley For Toxic Tweets

mm

Published

on

While discussing examples of hypermasculinity, Terry Crews had to take some time out to address DL Hughley. After implying Crews failed to defend himself, Hughley was met with a rhetorical question.

https://twitter.com/terrycrews/status/1089551790410936320

Following the release of Surviving R Kelly, Terry Crews was vocal about the multitude of support he received from Black women and urged others to believe victims. It wasn’t long before the chorus of “What about men” popped up to divert attention. Crews has been met with unfounded criticism following his decision to share details of his sexual assault. It seems every knuckle-dragging brute has crawled out from the darkness to regurgitate the same weak question. “Why didn’t you fight back?” DL Hughley is now among the horde of detractors that believes real men don’t get violated.

“Should I slap the sh*t out of you?”

The interaction between Terry Crews and DL Hughley began with a clip of Hughley’s podcast. Stating, “I think it’s hard for me to think that a dude with all those muscles can’t tell an agent to not touch him,” Hughley expressed his thoughts on Crews encounter. The ignorant comments prompted the hashtag #SlapHimTerry, in response to Hughley’s reply. Once Crews tweeted his scathing reply, DL moved to Instagram posting “It’s always the people that know you the least, that judge you the most. #ISaidWhatISaid #NoTakeBacks”

https://twitter.com/terrycrews/status/1089487033427361792

At an industry party in February 2016, Crews was accosted by Adam Venit, former head of WME talent agency. Carefully weighing the consequences of choosing physical retaliation, Crews chose not to attack Venit in the moment. Testifying before the Senate committee, Crews shared racial optics played a huge part in his reaction.

https://twitter.com/SenFeinstein/status/1011648748219486208

Had crews responded with violence, he would have committed career suicide. Instead of detailing his assault, headlines would have focused on a large, muscular Black actor attacking a White, high-profile executive at a party. His well of opportunities would run dry because he would be deemed a risk. Crews could have lost it all had he responded the way hypermasculinity dictated. Thankfully, cooler heads prevailed.

Stand By Terry

In the months following his testimony, Crews has defended himself from toxic men spewing ignorance on Twitter. Fed up with their foolishness, Crews has begun to name public figures that protect abusers and mock survivors.

https://twitter.com/terrycrews/status/1089494160871051266

With his actions, Crews has set a standard that others should follow. Acting with integrity, Terry Crews has successfully forced change at the talent agency that protected his assailant. WME replaced their HR head Carole Katz, who did nothing in response to Terry’s claims.

Comments

comments

For The Culture

With Integrity, Colin Kaepernick and Eric Reid Settle NFL Collusion Case

mm

Published

on

Colin Kaepernick Eric Reid

Without folding to the organization’s superiors, Colin Kaepernick and Eric Reid have emerged victorious, proving you can maintain your integrity and still be successful.

Just two days after Steve Harvey “coached” Mo’Nique on the benefits of placating industry elites and putting integrity aside for money, Colin Kaepernick’s attorney made an unexpected announcement. The athlete-turned-activist has settled his suit against the NFL over collusion to keep him out of the league.

Answering Injustice with Justice

Following National Anthem protests to bring awareness to injustices that oppress Black people and other people of color, the NFL punished Kaepernick. The league left him unsigned through the off-season and through 2017 training camps. This led to speculation that his departure from the league would be permanent and was caused by being blackballed.

In 2017, Eric Reid filed a grievance letter with the NFL. The letter alleged that under the influence of Donald Trump, the league conspired to prevent further employment opportunities because Reid was the second person to participate in National Anthem protests. Kaepernick and Reid shared the same legal representation during their similar cases. However, Reid remained employed and suffered several mandatory drug tests with 7 occurring during the 2018 season alone.

Nearly two-and-a-half years removed from the initial incident, Kaepernick and Reid’s agreement with the NFL has been reached, but with certain terms. In a joint statement issued by their legal representation, both Kaepernick and Reid are subject to a confidentiality agreement which demands no further comment on the issue.

As of now, no one knows the amount either of the former teammates has been paid to settle their dispute. However, sports experts are speculating Kaepernick was paid within the range of $60 to $80 million for lost wages. Regarding what he will do with his earnings, Kaepernick has been committed to activism across the country. His Million Dollar Pledge has concluded, but the athlete remains invested in the Know Your Rights Camp, which he founded in 2016. The free campaign was established to raise awareness on higher education, self empowerment, and proper law enforcement interaction in various scenarios.

Now that Kaepernick and Reid have settled their dispute, do you think Kaepernick should return to football? Or should he remain focused on activism and philanthropy?

Comments

comments

Continue Reading

For The Culture

Dapper Dan Meets With Gucci, Develops Inclusion Action Plan

mm

Published

on

Dapper Dan Gucci Blackface

Following the celebrity supported Gucci boycott, Dapper Dan met with the brand to discuss diversity, inclusion, and accountability. Their meeting concluded, the cultural icon of hip-hop fashion design plans to hold all fashion houses accountable for diversity and inclusivity within their respective brands.

Daniel “Dapper Dan” Day, along with a team of experts, approached Gucci with demands that the fashion house acts in the best interest of underrepresented groups. Comprised of ninety percent people of color, the team of corporate experts sat down with Gucci executives to develop a long-term action plan to make amends for a racially-insensitive balaclava design.

The $890 sweater featured a balaclava that, when extended, covered the wearer and mimicked blackface. Causing an immediate social media uproar, Gucci removed the sweater and acknowledged their mistake. Dapper Dan, who frequently used the brands imagery while establishing himself as a hip-hop couturier, was taken aback.

No Excuses

In 2017, recognition from Jay-Z and Black Twitter earned Dap a partnership with the luxury clothier. Dapper Dan partnered with Gucci’s CEO and creative director to develop a line of men’s wear. Ultimately, this resulted in a new atelier which opened in Harlem in 2018, making Dapper Dan of Harlem the first luxury fashion house in the Manhattan neighborhood. Still, this history of partnership and accomplishment did not muddy Dan’s feelings about Gucci’s despicable error.

Pledging to hold the brand accountable for their error, Dapper Dan and the corporate elite met with Gucci and discussed how the brand planned to atone for their cultural ignorance. Upon news of his meeting, celebrities who were participating in the boycott took to social media to share their discontentment. This prompted Dapper Dan to release a statement in defense of his meeting. He checked the culture on their disposal of Black fashion brands along with acknowledging the lack of opportunity for aspiring designers.

We have to LEARN TO EARN. What happened to all the Black fashion brands that failed since the ’80s? Was it because they didn’t get Black support, or was it because they didn’t know the business? Do you expect our young Black designers to spend 30+ years mastering fashion by teaching themselves as I did? How do you expect them to compete with the big brands if they don’t REALLY know the business? They need jobs and internships within these big brands so that they can learn and then branch out on their own.

We Must Hold Everyone Accountable

Addressing the opposition, Dapper Dan remarked that those who wanted to continue to boycott were free to do as they pleased. Before ending his statement, he added, “if anyone should be boycotted, it’s the brands that won’t give our young people an opportunity to learn. In an additional Instagram post featuring Floyd Mayweather Jr. and Jay-Z, Dapper Dan called out artists who purchased clothes on credit and then never patronized his business again once they achieved fame. Both the athlete and rapper-turned-business-mogul were integral in Dan’s reestablishment process after other luxury brands robbed him of his designs.

Insisting we must not only hold the brands accountable, but we must have a plan of action to amend the mistake and move forward, Dapper Dan invited Gucci to join the 21st century with new diversity and inclusivity policies. Their meeting, facilitated by a round-table of nearly ninety percent people of color, birthed an action plan for immediate implementation. Following the conclusion of their meeting, Gucci released a statement apologizing and outlining their long-term action plan to address culture and diversity awareness in the company.

Mediation, Resolution, Progress

Several key points of their intended plan include the creation of several jobs for global and regional directors for diversity and inclusion, a global learning program for diversity and inclusivity awareness, and a global exchange program. The company is also committing to a multi-cultural design scholarship. The 12-month fast track program, which partners with fashion schools, will amplify opportunities to underrepresented groups which will lead to full-time employment. Schools of focus for the scholarship are in New York (Harlem), Nairobi, New Delhi, Beijing, Hangzhou, Seoul, Tokyo, Beirut, London, and Dubai.

These immediate actions were developed with Dapper Dan, expert industry leaders, and Marco Bizzarri, Gucci’s current President and CEO. While many hold the ideology that you should not applaud a fish for swimming, it is important to remember that Gucci’s efforts are far above and beyond other companies, i.e. H&M.

Following H&M’s disastrous “Coolest Monkey In The Jungle” debacle, the company hired just two diversity leaders for their Global and North American markets and issued a public apology. The company has been unable to recover from their mistake which caused The Weeknd and G-Eazy to reject collaboration opportunities. One-year removed from their failure, H&M has recently announced 160 store closings worldwide.

Given Gucci’s response to their racist design and proposals for improvement, will you continue to boycott?

Comments

comments

Continue Reading

For The Culture

Dear Steve Harvey

mm

Published

on

Comments

comments

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending