Connect with us
Ilhan Omar Ilhan Omar

Politics

Ilhan Omar Calls Out AIPAC to Mixed Criticism

mm

Published

on

Representatives who were silent as Charlottesville Nazi’s were called “fine people” are having no difficulty raising their voices to condemn Ilhan Omar as an anti-Semite. I wonder why.

Speaking out about the influence of money from Israel on congressional support, Minnesota’s Democratic Representative Ilhan Omar criticized human rights violations toward Palestinians. She has been a vocal opponent of Israeli settlement building in the West Bank, territories which were originally allotted to the Arab state in 1947. However, comments made at a bookstore are what sparked the current wave of outrage that conservative pundits are using to push Islamophobia under the guise of defending Israeli-American relations.

Dangerous Ideologies

February 27th, Omar said, “I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is OK for people to push for allegiance to a foreign country.” This drew comparisons to an anti-Semitic trope that implies that Jewish citizens of any country will forever be more loyal to Israel than where they reside. These recent remarks, conservatives and centrist democrats have resorted to taking her tweets, which point out the problematic role of lobbyists, out of context to present a narrative that Ilhan is an anti-Semite. While Ilhan Omar has acknowledged that her language was offensive to some, she affirms that “whether it be AIPAC, the NRA, or the fossil fuel industry,” her views regarding their controversial contributions remain unchanged.

Those who openly refused to take on the President for his problematic language have jumped at the opportunity to condemn Ilhan Omar for her comments. However, they weren’t all on the same page when it came to a resolution that would effect their speech as well. Thursday, the House passed a resolution condemning both anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim discrimination, but 23 Republicans voted against the change.

Progress

Democrats and Independents voted in favor of condemning anti-Muslim bigotry for the first time in our nation’s history. While many were reluctant to defend the young Representative, four Presidential hopefuls stood by Omar amid the harsh criticism for her opinions on the Israeli government. Senator Bernie Sanders stated that backlash from Omar’s comments were “aimed at stopping a discussion about American’s foreign policy toward Israel.” He added that what he feared was happening was “an effort to target Congresswoman Omar as a way of stifling that debate.” Senator Kamala Harris chimed in with her own concerns and shared a brief statement:

We all have a responsibility to speak out against anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, homophobia, transphobia, racism, and all forms of hatred and bigotry, especially as we see a spike in hate crimes in America.”

Blood on the House Floor

As one of the first Muslims elected to Congress, she has been marked as a target by conservatives looking to eject her from politics altogether. One racist act, of particular note, resulted in a resignation and left one person injured.

In West Virginia, a physical fight broke out within Charleston’s Capitol building that spilled into the chamber of the House of Delegates. The fight began with an image connecting Ilhan to the terrorist attacks of 9/11. Speaking out to condemn the poster, Mike Pushkin, who is Jewish, commented that “In 1933 in Berlin, they might have had a similar poster about somebody like me.” Asking Republican Congressmen to stand with him in condemnation, Pushkin told the Washington Post “not a single Republican elected official in this building could join me in saying it’s wrong.” Pushkin said he was met with Republicans who spoke about the First Amendment instead.

Despite the criticism that Omar is facing, little has been said directly to Republicans who are abusing this controversy as an opportunity to air their prejudices. The division in our current government has made it apparent that there is immeasurable room for growth when it comes to addressing the right-wing administration of Netanyahu, liberty for Palestinians, and denouncing hate speech across Semitic and Islamic lines. As the first term of Trump’s administration comes to a close and with Congressional elections approaching, we must continue to work toward a future that sets us on a path of progression.

Comments

comments

Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Roger Stone Found Guilty on All Counts

mm

Published

on

Roger Stone has been found guilty on all seven counts by a federal jury. After lying about his part in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election conspiracy, the former political consultant could spend the rest of his life behind bars.

Once tied to the likes of Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan, Roger Stone, 67, was found guilty by a jury of nine women and three men of his involvement in the Russian interference plot. As part of the indictment led by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III, Roger Stone was charged for one count each of obstruction and witness tampering, along with five counts of false statements. Stone’s guilty verdict aids further proof to the truth millions have known all along — The Trump campaign was heavily invested in obtaining the files hacked by Russia and made public by WikiLeaks to derail the 2016 election in his favor.

While Roger Stone will not be sentenced until February 6th, 2020, he will face steep penalties for his crimes. Witness tampering alone could land the sexagenarian in prison for up to twenty years. However, the other charges he is facing add up to five-year terms. Prosecutors argued that since Stone has been out on bond before and during the proceedings, he should immediately be thrown in jail. Ultimately, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson is allowing Stone to remain free provided he meets the terms of a gag order.

Comments

comments

Continue Reading

Politics

Poor Race Relations Plague Pete Buttigieg, Not Homophobia

mm

Published

on

Pete Buttigieg is under fire for comments generalizing the Black community for their reluctance to support his campaign. Calling Black voters homophobic, the openly gay candidate has caught the ire of prospective constituents and fellow presidential hopeful, Kamala Harris. Although he maintains the narrative that “socially conservative” party members have been a challenge to navigate, Pete’s claims ignore the past of his poor race relations as mayor of South Bend.

As the first openly gay major Democratic presidential candidate, Pete Buttigieg is struggling to gain the positive attention of a base required to secure the nomination — Black voters. The former mayor believes the socially conservative morals of the Black community pose a significant threat to his candidacy. While he is reluctant to outright call the coveted base of supporters homophobic, the language is still there. In a recent interview, Buttigieg was noted as saying “Americans are capable of moving past old habit, moving past old prejudices” but the hurdles he must jump for the support of Black voters are of his own making.

Unresolved Injustice

Following the shooting death of Eric Logan at the hands of SBPD Officer O’Neill, Pete Buttigieg met with Black Lives Matter reps in a disastrous closed-door session. “Rushed” and perceived as self-serving, Buttigieg’s meeting with BLM was more of a courtesy than a step toward justice. Speaking of the experience, Los Angeles chapter co-founder Melina Abdullah said, “He seemed to have already taken a side. It did seem that he was prioritizing who he thought was important, and it didn’t seem to be Black people.” The meeting ended with the local chapter of Black Lives Matter calling for Pete Buttigieg’s resignation as mayor. While the details of the discussion have not been made public, criticism of the failed meeting has.

During the July phone call and subsequent meeting, the largest disagreement between BLM and Buttigieg was the termination of South Bend PD’s Chief Scott Ruszkowski. Brought on after Buttigieg demoted Darryl Boykin, the city’s first Black police chief, BLM found Ruszkowski unfit to serve the community. Citing his lack of care for Black citizens, BLM sought to hold the chief accountable for O’Neill’s failure to activate his body cam. Noting his outright refusal to fire the chief because of perceived community support, activist Jordan Giger asked, “When you think about these issues, who is the public that you’re thinking about? The white public or the Black public?” Giger continued, Buttitieg took notes, but did not have an answer.

Unaddressed Income Inequality

Outside of the tense relations Buttigieg faced in South Bend due to mishandling of the fallout from Eric Logan’s death, disenfranchised citizens expressed they felt “left behind” in South Bend’s poorest neighborhoods. A 16-year-old resident commented somberly that nothing had changed in his neighborhood. “This sh*t looks the same, every time I walk through here.” However, housing in downtown South Bend has never looked better. Highlighting the city’s income inequality issues, residents have expressed their concern with his lack of progress while critiquing his presidential campaign. Shawn White, a South Bend local, says “How is he gonna run the whole country if you can’t get your city right first?” With more than 40 percent of South Bend’s population being Black, Brown, and subject to the burdens of housing costs and unemployment, many carry the same doubts of his potential as the commander in chief, never mentioning his sexuality as a reason for his incapability. Still, South Carolina Congressman Jim Clyburn insists homophobia is what’s preventing Buttigieg from securing the Black vote.

Perpetuating Stereotypes Doesn’t Bridge Gaps

During an interview on CNN with Dana Bash, Jim Clyburn remarked that the reluctance to vote for an openly gay man residing with his husband was a “generational issue.” Clyburn, 79, believes there’s “no question” Buttigieg’s sexuality is hurting his popularity among older Black voters in South Carolina, but Black voters have spoken out en masse on social media. Pointing to Buttigieg’s troubled race relations, many share Kamala’s sentiments that the presidential hopeful is misinformed.

Attacking assertions of homophobic bias, California Senator Kamala Harris has called out the claims as “misinformed, misdirected, and just simply wrong.” On Monday, Senator Harris pointed out that while biases against LGBTQ+ persons exist, they are not limited one community. She continued that statements singling out the Black community for homophobia and transphobia ignore queer Black persons who are loved, supported, and accepted by those who love them dearly.

Comments

comments

Continue Reading

Politics

Beto O’Rourke Admits Ancestors Owned Slaves, Talks Reparations

mm

Published

on

Sunday, Beto O’ Rourke shared the discovery of he and his wife’s descendants from slave owners. Acknowledging their benefit from institutionalized chattel slavery, the Presidential hopeful owned his painful legacy while outlining several policies, which include reparations.

“We all need to know our own story as it relates to the national story, much as I am learning mine.”

Beto O’Rourke

In a post written for Medium, O’Rourke stated he was provided with documents showing his paternal and maternal great-great-great grandfather’s owned, slaves. Rose and Eliza, whose names were found listed in a property log, were enslaved by O’Rourke’s paternal ancestor, Andrew Cowan Jasper. But the discovery would uncover that not only did he descend from slave owners, but his wife also had as well. Discussing their personal connection to the legacy of slavery in the US, O’Rourke lamented what Rose, Eliza, and other enslaved Africans endured, were denied, and what repercussions their ancestors suffered.

“I benefit from a system that my ancestors built to favor themselves at the expense of others. That only increases the urgency I feel to help change this country so that it works for those who have been locked-out of or — locked-up in — this system.”

Beto O’Rourke

You cannot navigate life in the America of today without first acknowledging its racist foundations. From the moment the first nineteen enslaved Africans arrived in Jamestown, Virginia in 1619, the institution of slavery threaded them through a needle of cruelty and stitched them into the fabric of American society. Generations of Africans were denied their freedom, civil rights, and ability to amass wealth through a practice that forced them to push their White counterparts ahead. This advantage, hesitantly understood by O’Rourke, benefits him, his spouse, and his children while continuing to suppress the growth of Black families to this day. Still, Beto admits the wrongs of his ancestors while contemplating how he, as President, could enact policies to tip the scales.

“I will do everything I can”

Touching on the wealth disparity, Beto discussed the imbalanced incarceration rate and infant mortality rates between Black and White Americans. Seeing the nation as two Americas to be bridged, O’Rourke wants to rectify the economic, educational, criminal justice, and even technological biases that pervade our nation. Detailing his plan, Beto began with educational changes, providing $23 billion immediately to address underfunding in minority-majority public schools. With attention to economic biases, he plans to ensure equal pay and dispense capital to minority and women-owned businesses. With criminal justice being at the forefront of the conversation for many candidates and prospective voters, O’Rourke moves to end the drug war and expunging arrest records for nonviolent drug crimes. However, his stance on reparations, while he does support it, rests on Americans understanding of the country’s history before pursuing cash payouts.

The overall reception of Beto O’Rourke’s admission has been positive as he is being lauded for confronting his problematic legacy head-on. However, he is still being accused of performative activism. Detractors are labeling his recent discovery as a pandering attempt to garner votes from Black constituents.

Do you think this is a step in the right direction for Beto? Would you like to see this sort of genealogical research become a requirement for Presidential candidates?

Comments

comments

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Trending