Sixteen states have united with a lawsuit declaring Trump has veered the country toward a constitutional crisis of his own making. If successful, the coalition could effectively halt the funding of the United States-Mexico border wall.
Filed in Federal District Court in San Francisco, the lawsuit argues that the power to divert funds for the United States-Mexico border wall belongs to Congress and not to the president. Announced February 15th, Donald Trump declared a national emergency to secure funding for the imperialist monument to white supremacy. However, he is violating the law and subverting the Constitution because the president does not control spending, Congress does. His actions have now brought on two lawsuits from the ACLU and 16 state coalition with the following participants:
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
Wall of Lies
In his declaration, which was cut short on CBS for ‘The Price is Right’, Donald Trump said, “So we’re going to be signing today, and registering, national emergency and it’s a great thing to do. Because we have an invasion of drugs, invasion of gangs, invasion of people and it’s unacceptable. And by signing the national emergency, something signed many times by other presidents, many, many times — President Obama, in fact — we may be using one of the national emergencies that he signed having to do with cartels, criminal cartels. It’s a very good emergency that he signed.” However, the attorney general of California states the president has implicated himself in a crime.
Xavier Becerra, California AG, says that the president has undercut his argument regarding an actual border emergency. Per his own words, Trump stated, “I just want to get it done faster, that’s all.” Congress has it’s own plan to challenge the president’s emergency declaration. On top of the several impending lawsuits that could halt the construction of the border wall, AG William Barr is preparing to announce the end of Robert Mueller’s two-year long Russia investigation. According to CNN, the confidential report could be submitted as early as next week.
Ilhan Omar Calls Out AIPAC to Mixed Criticism
Representatives who were silent as Charlottesville Nazi’s were called “fine people” are having no difficulty raising their voices to condemn Ilhan Omar as an anti-Semite. I wonder why.
Speaking out about the influence of money from Israel on congressional support, Minnesota’s Democratic Representative Ilhan Omar criticized human rights violations toward Palestinians. She has been a vocal opponent of Israeli settlement building in the West Bank, territories which were originally allotted to the Arab state in 1947. However, comments made at a bookstore are what sparked the current wave of outrage that conservative pundits are using to push Islamophobia under the guise of defending Israeli-American relations.
February 27th, Omar said, “I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is OK for people to push for allegiance to a foreign country.” This drew comparisons to an anti-Semitic trope that implies that Jewish citizens of any country will forever be more loyal to Israel than where they reside. These recent remarks, conservatives and centrist
Those who openly refused to take on the President for his problematic language have jumped at the opportunity to condemn Ilhan Omar for her comments. However, they weren’t all on the same page when it came to a resolution that would effect their speech as well. Thursday, the House passed a resolution condemning both anti-Semitism and anti-Muslim discrimination, but 23 Republicans voted against the change.
Democrats and Independents voted in favor of condemning anti-Muslim bigotry for the first time in our nation’s history. While many were reluctant to defend the young Representative, four Presidential hopefuls stood by Omar amid the harsh criticism for her opinions on the Israeli government. Senator Bernie Sanders stated that backlash from Omar’s comments were “aimed at stopping a discussion about American’s foreign policy toward Israel.” He added that what he feared was happening was “an effort to target Congresswoman Omar as a way of stifling that debate.” Senator Kamala Harris chimed in with her own concerns and shared a brief statement:
We all have a responsibility to speak out against anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, homophobia, transphobia, racism, and all forms of hatred and bigotry, especially as we see a spike in hate crimes in America.”
Blood on the House Floor
As one of the first Muslims elected to Congress, she has been marked as a target by conservatives looking to eject her from politics altogether. One racist act, of particular note, resulted in a resignation and left one person injured.
In West Virginia, a physical fight broke out within Charleston’s Capitol building that spilled into the chamber of the House of Delegates. The fight began with an image connecting Ilhan to the terrorist attacks of 9/11. Speaking out to condemn the poster, Mike Pushkin, who is Jewish, commented that “In 1933 in Berlin, they might have had a similar poster about somebody like me.” Asking Republican Congressmen to stand with him in condemnation, Pushkin told the Washington Post “not a single Republican elected official in this building could join me in saying it’s wrong.” Pushkin said he was met with Republicans who spoke about the First Amendment instead.
Despite the criticism that Omar is facing, little has been said directly to Republicans who are abusing this controversy as an opportunity to air their prejudices. The division in our current government has made it apparent that there is immeasurable room for growth when it comes to addressing the right-wing administration of Netanyahu, liberty for Palestinians, and denouncing hate speech across Semitic and Islamic lines. As the first term of Trump’s administration comes to a close and with Congressional elections approaching, we must continue to work toward a future that sets us on a path of progression.
Paul Manafort Sentenced to 47 months in Prison
Former Trump presidential campaign chairman and political consultant Paul Manafort has recently been sentenced for financial fraud. This conviction is the first of two cases levied against him.
As a result of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation, Paul Manafort has been sentenced to nearly four years in prison. His sentence is a far cry from the 19- to – 24 year prison term that was expected. According to the New York Times, Judge T.S. Ellis III of Alexandria, VA., gave Manafort such a light punishment because the guidelines were deemed too harsh.
Manafort plead for mercy before receiving his judgment. Members of Mueller’s prosecution team did not seek a specific sentence in the case. Still, Manafort received the harshest judgment out of the six former Trump employees to be prosecuted by Mueller.
Judge Ellis’ sentence has received much criticism from legal experts. While lighter sentencing is common in white-collar cases, the drop from 19 years to less than four has disappointed many onlookers of this high-profile case.
Defense attorney’s presumably swayed Judge Ellis into a lighter sentencing due to Manafort’s age. He is nearly 70 years old and has significant health issues. On top of time in prison, Manafort is expected to pay $25 million in restitution along with a $50,000 fine. Judge Ellis is crediting Manafort for nine months of time served, which means the convict could be out in roughly 3 years.
Other Trump advisers who have been sentenced include:
- Michael Cohen – Sentenced to 3 years in prison
- George Papadopolous – Sentenced to 14 days in prison
- Alex van der Zwaan – Sentenced to 30 days in prison
- Richard Pinedo – Sentenced to 6 months in prison
Trump advisers who have pleaded guilty or have been charged include:
- Michael T. Flynn – Pleaded Guilty
- Rick Gates – Pleaded Guilty
- Roger Stone – Charged
- Konstantin V. Kilimnik – Charged
- Twelve Russian Intelligence Officers – Charged
- Thirteen Russian Nationals – Charged
As a result of Mueller’s investigation, five additional parties faced charges due to inquiries that branched off from the initial probe.
Cohen Airs Out Trump in Congress Testimony
Michael Cohen testified before the House Oversight Committee on Capitol Hiil and bared the truth of Trump’s misdeeds, singing songs of the atrocities of Trump’s Administration.
The former personal lawyer for President Donald Trump admitted much to Congress during his testimony, quickly earning him personal attacks from disappointed fellow Republicans. Among his admissions, Cohen called Trump “a racist, a conman, and a cheat,” which many of us had known long before he hit the Oval Office. Although bits of his testimony were considered “not fake news, but old news”, Cohen did share some startling information.
Donald Trump and Michael Cohen are under investigation by the Southern District of New York. Cohen’s revelation prevented him from answering certain questions as the investigation in New York is ongoing. Cohen was asked multiple times about records he refused to provide to Congress, which he says were obtained during the raid of his home last fall. When asked if he had continued contact with Donald Trump, Cohen said yes, but withheld details. Two months after the FBI raided Michael Cohen’s home, he spoke with Donald Trump, who he admits communicates in code.
Convicted Russian Mobsters on Payroll
In addition to revealing he purposefully wrote NDA’s to prevent people from coming forward with claims of wrongdoing, Cohen revealed a business relationship between Trump and Felix Sater. Sater is a convicted Russian mobster who was a real estate developer and former manager of the Bayrock Group, LLC. Sater listed himself as a Senior Advisor to Trump on business cards and held contracts with the President where he was paid through Michael Cohen. Bank records, which Cohen alleges were in boxes that were in his raided home and office, indicate payments to Sater’s company, AROC.
This brought a represetative to ask Cohen if he believed the Trump presidency ever stopped being about money. Cohen said yes, but it only stopped when he became president. Now, Cohen says Trump’s goal is autocracy. During his testimony, Cohen said, “he’s sending the message that this is his county; he’s becoming an autocrat.” Autocracy is the system of government with one person with absolute power, where while not officially, Putin has been operating Russia as such.
The testimony yet in progress, Cohen is still being grilled about his complicity in a corrupt campaign and administration.
Entertainment1 week ago
Jess Hilarious Catches Heat for Islamophobic Remarks
King Of Reads TV1 week ago
Dear Jess “Isn’t” Hilarious
Entertainment1 week ago
After Saying “F*ck Y’all” For Islamophobic Comments, Jess “Ain’t” Hilarious Offers Half Ass Apology
Entertainment5 days ago
Trickle Down Adultery: Is Wendy Williams Financing Kevin’s Affair?
Entertainment5 days ago
Erica Mena’s Ex, Cliff Dixon Robbed and Killed After Birthday Celebration
Entertainment16 hours ago
“She’s broke!” Eva Marcille’s Bitter Bridesmaid Spills Tea to Marlo Hampton
Trending6 days ago
Daniel Caesar “Morphing into Uncle Ruckus” According to Fans After Berating Blacks in “Drunk” Live Rant
Trending3 days ago
‘Us’ Movie Review & Ending Explained